DALLAS, Nov. 3, 2003 – Alcatel (Paris : CGEP.PA and NYSE : ALA) today announced that it has filed a response in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, denying the infringement of a patent alleged in a complaint brought by OFS/Fitel.
Alcatel’s patented TeraLight optical fiber has been widely available since 1999 and is the first of a new generation of optical fiber designed for the networks of the future. TeraLight has established new levels of performance with numerous bandwidth and distance records for both 10- and 40-Gbit/s applications.
Prior to the filing of this litigation, Alcatel informed OFS/Fitel that the TeraLight products neither used the Fitel patent nor was the Fitel patent valid. OFS/Fitel was well aware of the invalidity of its patent but nonetheless chose to respond by bringing this litigation. Alcatel strongly believes the marketplace should not be misled by the claims in the Fitel lawsuit regarding Alcatel products that have been in the market for several years. Alcatel will vigorously defend TeraLight and its position in the marketplace by showing that the OFS/Fitel claim is baseless and that the Fitel patent is neither infringed, nor valid, nor enforceable.
About Alcatel
Alcatel provides end-to-end communications solutions, enabling carriers, service providers and enterprises to deliver content to any type of user, anywhere in the world. Leveraging its long-term leadership in telecommunications network equipment as well as its expertise in applications and network services, Alcatel enables its customers to focus on optimizing their service offerings and revenue streams. With sales of Euro 16.5 billion in 2002, Alcatel operates in more than 130 countries.
Contact press alcatel.com
Accueil du site > Acteurs > Acteurs économiques > Alcatel > Communiqués de presse > Alcatel Denies Patent Infringement Allegations by Fitel USA
Alcatel Denies Patent Infringement Allegations by Fitel USA
lundi 3 novembre 2003
par Gérald Sédrati-Dinet (gibus)
Voir en ligne : Communiqué original sur le site d’Alcatel
Gérald Sédrati-Dinet (gibus)
Articles de cet auteur
Accueil du site |
Contact |
Plan du site |
Espace privé |
visites : 32090
fr
Acteurs
Acteurs économiques
Alcatel
Communiqués de presse
Site réalisé avec SPIP 2.1.8 + AHUNTSIC
- 10/134 ACTA
- 0/134 actions
- 0/134 Advanced Software Design
- 0/134 Aerotel and Macrossan
- 0/134 agenda
- 22/134 album
- 0/134 Alcatel-Lucent
- 0/134 Alison Brimelow
- 0/134 Allied Security Trust
- 0/134 Ancora
- 0/134 annuaire
- 0/134 Apple Computer
- 0/134 Apple Computer
- 134/134 article long
- 0/134 AT&T
- 0/134 BPAI
- 0/134 Brevet Apple sur le multi-touch
- 0/134 Brevet Cygnus sur la navigation iconique
- 0/134 Brevet écran tactile Alcatel-Lucent
- 0/134 Brevet Microsoft sur l’utilisation de Page Up et Page Down
- 0/134 Brevet mp3 Alcatel Lucent
- 0/134 Brevet Netcraft sur la facturation par Internet
- 0/134 Brevet Picsel sur la représentation rapide d’images pendant une modification
- 0/134 Brevets CSIRO sur le Wifi 802.11n
- 0/134 Brevets et standards
- 0/134 Brevets Qualcomm sur le H.264
- 0/134 Broadcom
- 0/134 Broadcom
- 0/134 Buffalo
- 0/134 Bureautique, productivité
- 0/134 CAFC
- 0/134 capital-risque
- 0/134 Cisco
- 0/134 Cloud computing, operating systems
- 0/134 commentaires
- 0/134 commentaires
- 0/134 Commission Européenne
- 0/134 Communication inter-ordinateur
- 0/134 CSIRO
- 0/134 Cygnus Systems
- 0/134 Dell
- 0/134 Développement logiciel cross plate-forme
- 0/134 Droit Européen
- 0/134 Droit international
- 0/134 Droit UK
- 0/134 droit US
- 0/134 ebay
- 0/134 Ecran tactile / multitouch
- 21/134 Editorial
- 0/134 Effet technique
- 0/134 Elan Microelectronics
- 5/134 encours
- 0/134 Enlarged Board of Appeal
- 0/134 EPC
- 6/134 EPO
- 0/134 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 0/134 forum
- 0/134 forum
- 0/134 François Pellegrini
- 0/134 Fred Wilson
- 0/134 Google
- 0/134 Google
- 6/134 Groupe BLOEB
- 30/134 Groupe de travail
- 15/134 Groupe de travail informatique
- 0/134 Hewlett-Packard (HP)
- 0/134 i4i
- 0/134 Kaspersky Lab
- 0/134 kiosque
- 0/134 Linux
- 0/134 Mallun Yen
- 0/134 Mark Halligan
- 7/134 membres
- 0/134 Microsoft
- 0/134 Microsoft
- 0/134 Microsoft
- 0/134 Microsoft vs. i4i
- 8/134 migration
- 0/134 NetApp
- 0/134 Netcraft
- 0/134 Nokia
- 0/134 Nokia vs Apple (iphone)
- 0/134 Open Invention Network
- 0/134 Organisme gouvernemental US
- 0/134 Parlement Européen
- 0/134 Paypal
- 0/134 Picsel Technologies
- 0/134 post-Bilski
- 0/134 PVR / multimedia
- 0/134 Qualcomm
- 0/134 Qualcomm
- 0/134 Red Hat
- 0/134 Représentation des données
- 0/134 SBA
- 0/134 Sun
- 0/134 Survalorisation des brevets
- 0/134 swpatcninofr
- 0/134 Symbian
- 0/134 TechRadium
- 0/134 Téléphonie mobile
- 0/134 TiVo
- 0/134 TomTom
- 0/134 Toshiba
- 0/134 Twitter
- 0/134 UK-IPO
- 0/134 Uniloc
- 0/134 US
- 0/134 US PTO
- 0/134 Verizon
- 0/134 Web, réseaux sociaux
- 0/134 10-Demande de brevet logiciel
- 0/134 11-Brevet logiciel accepté
- 0/134 12-Brevet rejeté
- 0/134 13-Brevet logiciel accepté (en appel)
- 0/134 14-Brevet annulé
- 0/134 15-Brevet inapplicable
- 0/134 20-Injonction ou procès en contrefaçon (démarrage)
- 0/134 21-Injonction ou procès en contrefaçon (succès)
- 0/134 22-Injonction ou procès en contrefaçon (échec)
- 0/134 23-Appel, tractation
- 0/134 30-pression (sur la base d’un brevet obtenu)
- 0/134 40-Transaction (suite à procédure)
- 0/134 50-Vente
