Paris, 20 December 2000 — The Japanese Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) has issued a positive opinion concerning the commercial operation of the 3G Patent Platform, following an extensive review during the last ten months. The 3G Patent Platform was deemed to be pro-competitive and to serve the interests of the global telecommunication industry.
The other two major competition authorities, namely the European Commission (EC) and the US Department of Justice (DoJ), Anti-Trust Division, are in the final stage of their review and the outcome of their findings is anticipated soon. Pending the approval from the EC and DoJ, commercial service provision should commence in spring 2001 and will be open to all interested companies.
The 3G Patent Platform has been defined by the world’s leading wireless companies for the provision of services for evaluating, certifying and licensing Essential Patents for third generation mobile communication systems. Commercial services will be provided online within a new service company, 3G Patents Ltd, currently being established under English law.
3G Patents Ltd is being set up with the aim of handling the complexity of acquiring patent licenses for 3G mobile communication systems under known terms and conditions, which will make 3G technology more affordable to all players (e.g. operators, suppliers, chip manufacturers, service providers, end-users). By making the technology more affordable, the 3G market will be catalysed and the business case will become more attractive. Unlike GSM, where owners of essential technology amounted to no more than about twenty companies, more than one hundred companies are likely to own patents essential for realising 3G mobile communication systems and the actual number of essential patents will increase considerably.
« The JFTC decision is a landmark event for such a co-operative industry initiative, bringing about an innovative approach for fast technology transfer. Every effort will be made to encourage all industry players to use the services of 3G Patents Ltd which has been set up to benefit the whole mobile industry, » said Brian Kearsey, Managing Director (Designate) of 3G Patents Ltd.
Background for journalists
The 3G Patent Platform specification has been defined by more than forty international wireless companies between February 1998 and June 1999 within the framework of the UMTS IPR Working Group and the UMTS Intellectual Property Association (UIPA). The preparatory work for the launch of 3G Patents Ltd has been undertaken fourteen months ago by some of the world’s leading 3G operators and suppliers and trade organisations within the framework of an industry alliance called the 3G Patent Platform Partnership (3G3P). Nonetheless, the services provided by 3G Patents Ltd are available to all companies world-wide.
Alcatel, Bosch, Cegetel, ETRI, France Telecom, Fujitsu, Korea Telecom, KPN, LG, Matsushita, Mitsubishi Electric, NEC, NTT DoCoMo, Samsung, SK Telecom, Siemens, Sonera, Sony, Telecom Italia Mobile. The GSM Association and ETNO (European Telecommunication Network Operators) are Associate Partners.
For more information, please contact :
Dr. Serge RAES,
Business Development Director
3G Patent Platform Partnership
Tel : +33 1 3459 0864 or 63
Mobile : +33 1 4076 1109
Fax : +33 1 3459 0864
E-Mail : serge.raes alcatel.fr
22, rue de Beynes
F-78450 Chavenay
FranceA dedicated website should become operational soon at http://www.3Gpatents.com
Contact press www.alcatel.com
Accueil du site > Acteurs > Acteurs économiques > Alcatel > Communiqués de presse > Japanese Competition Authority Approves the 3G Patent Platform
Japanese Competition Authority Approves the 3G Patent Platform
mercredi 20 décembre 2000
par Gérald Sédrati-Dinet (gibus)
Voir en ligne : Communiqué original sur le site d’Alcatel
Gérald Sédrati-Dinet (gibus)
Articles de cet auteur
Accueil du site |
Contact |
Plan du site |
Espace privé |
visites : 21220
fr
Acteurs
Acteurs économiques
Alcatel
Communiqués de presse
Site réalisé avec SPIP 2.1.8 + AHUNTSIC
- 14/512 ACTA
- 0/512 actions
- 0/512 Advanced Software Design
- 0/512 Aerotel and Macrossan
- 0/512 agenda
- 14/512 album
- 0/512 Alcatel-Lucent
- 0/512 Alison Brimelow
- 0/512 Allied Security Trust
- 0/512 Ancora
- 0/512 annuaire
- 0/512 Apple Computer
- 0/512 Apple Computer
- 512/512 article long
- 0/512 AT&T
- 0/512 BPAI
- 0/512 Brevet Apple sur le multi-touch
- 0/512 Brevet Cygnus sur la navigation iconique
- 0/512 Brevet écran tactile Alcatel-Lucent
- 0/512 Brevet Microsoft sur l’utilisation de Page Up et Page Down
- 0/512 Brevet mp3 Alcatel Lucent
- 0/512 Brevet Netcraft sur la facturation par Internet
- 0/512 Brevet Picsel sur la représentation rapide d’images pendant une modification
- 0/512 Brevets CSIRO sur le Wifi 802.11n
- 0/512 Brevets et standards
- 0/512 Brevets Qualcomm sur le H.264
- 0/512 Broadcom
- 0/512 Broadcom
- 0/512 Buffalo
- 0/512 Bureautique, productivité
- 0/512 CAFC
- 0/512 capital-risque
- 0/512 Cisco
- 0/512 Cloud computing, operating systems
- 0/512 commentaires
- 0/512 commentaires
- 0/512 Commission Européenne
- 0/512 Communication inter-ordinateur
- 0/512 CSIRO
- 0/512 Cygnus Systems
- 0/512 Dell
- 0/512 Développement logiciel cross plate-forme
- 0/512 Droit Européen
- 0/512 Droit international
- 0/512 Droit UK
- 0/512 droit US
- 0/512 ebay
- 0/512 Ecran tactile / multitouch
- 100/512 Editorial
- 0/512 Effet technique
- 0/512 Elan Microelectronics
- 19/512 encours
- 0/512 Enlarged Board of Appeal
- 0/512 EPC
- 9/512 EPO
- 0/512 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 0/512 forum
- 0/512 forum
- 0/512 François Pellegrini
- 0/512 Fred Wilson
- 0/512 Google
- 0/512 Google
- 9/512 Groupe BLOEB
- 64/512 Groupe de travail
- 38/512 Groupe de travail informatique
- 0/512 Hewlett-Packard (HP)
- 0/512 i4i
- 0/512 Kaspersky Lab
- 0/512 kiosque
- 0/512 Linux
- 0/512 Mallun Yen
- 0/512 Mark Halligan
- 22/512 membres
- 0/512 Microsoft
- 0/512 Microsoft
- 0/512 Microsoft
- 0/512 Microsoft vs. i4i
- 16/512 migration
- 0/512 NetApp
- 0/512 Netcraft
- 0/512 Nokia
- 0/512 Nokia vs Apple (iphone)
- 0/512 Open Invention Network
- 0/512 Organisme gouvernemental US
- 0/512 Parlement Européen
- 0/512 Paypal
- 0/512 Picsel Technologies
- 0/512 post-Bilski
- 0/512 PVR / multimedia
- 0/512 Qualcomm
- 0/512 Qualcomm
- 0/512 Red Hat
- 0/512 Représentation des données
- 0/512 SBA
- 0/512 Sun
- 0/512 Survalorisation des brevets
- 0/512 swpatcninofr
- 0/512 Symbian
- 0/512 TechRadium
- 0/512 Téléphonie mobile
- 0/512 TiVo
- 0/512 TomTom
- 0/512 Toshiba
- 0/512 Twitter
- 0/512 UK-IPO
- 0/512 Uniloc
- 0/512 US
- 0/512 US PTO
- 0/512 Verizon
- 0/512 Web, réseaux sociaux
- 0/512 10-Demande de brevet logiciel
- 0/512 11-Brevet logiciel accepté
- 0/512 12-Brevet rejeté
- 0/512 13-Brevet logiciel accepté (en appel)
- 0/512 14-Brevet annulé
- 0/512 15-Brevet inapplicable
- 0/512 20-Injonction ou procès en contrefaçon (démarrage)
- 0/512 21-Injonction ou procès en contrefaçon (succès)
- 0/512 22-Injonction ou procès en contrefaçon (échec)
- 0/512 23-Appel, tractation
- 0/512 30-pression (sur la base d’un brevet obtenu)
- 0/512 40-Transaction (suite à procédure)
- 0/512 50-Vente
